The Measure That Became the Meaning; How the PCL-R’s Success Derailed Psychopathy Research
If you want to understand what psychopathy is, you begin with Robert Hare’s Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. The PCL-R is the “gold standard” for assessing psychopathy worldwide, used in courtrooms, prisons, parole boards, and forensic hospitals across dozens of countries. A high score on this twenty-item checklist can add years to a sentence, revoke parole, and consign…
Read MoreThe Case for Reframing Primary Psychopathy as Neurodivergence
Why one of the most stigmatized neurological conditions may also be one of the most misunderstood The word “psychopath” conjures images of serial killers and corporate predators, Hannibal Lecter behind glass or Patrick Bateman with an axe. But the neurological profile we call primary psychopathy, characterized by constitutional differences in emotional processing rather than antisocial…
Read MoreCritiquing the Forensic Lens on Psychopathy
Summary Critique The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), developed by Robert Hare in the 1980s, has achieved something remarkable in psychology: near-total dominance over how we conceptualize an entire condition. Originally designed to answer a narrow forensic question, which incarcerated individuals are most likely to reoffend, the PCL-R became the definitional standard for psychopathy itself. This represents…
Read MoreNeuroscience of Psychopathy and Empathy
1. Summary of Neurological Findings Research over the past two decades, particularly neuroimaging work by Kent Kiehl and others, has identified a relatively consistent pattern of structural and functional brain differences in individuals scoring high on measures of psychopathy. The most replicated finding involves reduced amygdala volume and reactivity, particularly to distress cues and fearful…
Read MoreTime, Value, and the Problem with Expectations
Forward Note: This thing I’ve written is a simple worldview I’ve held since I was about 25. The reason I think it is worthy of writing about is because in life we all make irrational decisions, or put up with things that we can control – but choose not to. This can be convenience, the…
Read MoreThe Law of Attraction: A Harmful Philosophy Disguised as Positivity
The Law of Attraction has zero scientific backing, no matter what its proponents claim. There is no credible body of scientific research to support it, no empirical tests to prove its validity, and any observed “results” are easily explained by cognitive biases, misunderstandings of probability, statistical averaging, and selective framing. Worst of all, the concept…
Read MoreAn Opinion on Psychology’s Blind Spots
Before we start, I want you to chew on something first: In writing this, I am potentially taking a risk that few others face when sharing their identity even in consideration of modern marginalized groups. I’ll explain why later, but for now, consider this question: Are even the best of us truly inclusive? I am…
Read MoreThe Selective Empathy Paradox: Perspective on Modern Inclusion
Inclusivity and empathy for marginalized groups are major – and crucial – topics in our society today. Yet, I’ve noticed a tendency for these discussions to snowball into a cycle where we increasingly create identities that emphasize our differences from others, even when those differences are minor. In many ways, it seems like we’ve developed…
Read More